Etcheson v. FCA US LLC
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtO'Rourke, J.
*37*834Plaintiffs and appellants Jamie L. Etcheson and Kelly M. Etcheson brought an action under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act ( Civ. Code,1 § 1790 et seq., commonly known as the "lemon law," hereafter the Act) against defendant and respondent FCA US LLC (FCA) after experiencing problems with a vehicle they had purchased new for about $40,000. After admitting the vehicle qualified for repurchase under the Act, FCA made two offers to compromise under Code of Civil Procedure section 998 ( section 998 ): one in March 2015, to which plaintiffs objected and the trial court found was…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Murillo v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
- Graciano v. Robinson Ford Sales, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Premier Medical Management Systems, Inc. v. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hanna v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Aviles v. Subaru of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Chapman v. Hyundai Motor America CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Duff v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Figures v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.