Legal Opinion

McGarry v. Ellis

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 21, 1921No. Civ. No. 3987PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This is an action by the plaintiff herein, alleging himself to be a property owner of the city of Clovis, to restrain the defendant R. W. Ellis, as superintendent of streets of said city, and the defendant Clark & Henery Construction Company, as contractors, from proceeding with the performance of certain street work within said city under proceedings theretofore inaugurated by the officials thereof under the provisions of the Improvement Act of 1911 (Stats. 1911, p. 730), and which proceedings had progressed through the various legal stages provided for in said act up to the award of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Watkinson v. VaughnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Perine v. ErzgraberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Minnesota & M. Land & Improvement Co. v. City of BillingsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
  4. Kane v. WedellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. Hutton v. NewhouseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Federal Construction Co. v. EnsignCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  2. O. T. Johnson Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. County of Riverside v. WhitlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Behneman v. Alameda-Contra Costa Transit DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Bou v. WillitsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API