Legal Opinion
Turner & Happersett v. Hall & Connor
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided September 16, 1920PublishedCited by 25 opinions
Error to a judgment of the Circuit 'Court of Wise county in an action of assumpsit. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendants assign error.
1Opinion of the Court
Kelly, P.,
delivered the opinion of the court.
On July 5, 1918, the parties to this controversy entered into a written contract as follows:
“This agreement made this 5th day of July, 1918, between H. H. Hall and C. G. Connor, parties of the first part, and H. G. Happersett and M. W. Turner, parties of the 2nd part.
“Witnesseth, that for and in consideration of $8,000.00, $4,000.00 to be paid to parties of 1st part within thirty days from this date and balance of $4,000.00 in six months from this date with reservation to pay sooner if parties of 2nd part desire. The parties of the 1st part agree…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- American Agricultural Chemical Co. v. KennedySupreme Court of Virginia · 1904
- Watkins v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
- Hanly v. WattersonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
- Cummins v. BeaversSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904
- Camp v. WilsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Sattler v. BaileyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
- Geoghegan Sons & Co. v. Arbuckle Bros.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1924
- Greater Richmond Civic Recreation, Inc. v. A. H. Ewing's Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1959
- Norris v. BarbourSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
- Fuchs v. United Motor Stage Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.