Legal Opinion
Camp v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided June 29, 1899PublishedCited by 26 opinions
Error to a judgment of the- Circuit Court of Eansemond county, rendered May 13, 1898, in an action of covenant, wherein the defendant in error was the plaintiff, and the plaintiff in error was the defendant.
1Opinion of the Court
Keith, P.:
Camp and Wilson entered into- a contract from which the following extract is made:
“ This agreement, entered into on the 11th day of September, 1889, between Isaac T. Wilson of the first part, and W. JST. Camp, all of Hansemond county, State of Virginia, of the second part, witnesseth: That whereas the said Isaac T. Wilson of the first part, for the consideration hereinafter stipulated, has bargained and agreed to- cut, haul, and deliver to- the said W. H. Camp, the second party, from the timbered lands belonging to the Gay Manufacturing Company along the line of the Suffolk and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- American Manganese Co. v. Virginia Manganese Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1895
3Cited by26 opinions
- Nehi Bottling Company, Incorporated v. All-American Bottling Corporation, John Armes v. All-American Bottling CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Geoghegan Sons & Co. v. Arbuckle Bros.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1924
- Coats v. General Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Watson v. Buckhannon River Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1923
- Nelson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.