Legal Opinion

Fuchs v. United Motor Stage Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1939No. 27415PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The sole question and assignment of error presented by the record in this case is whether the Court of Common Pleas was justified in sustaining the general demurrer to plaintiff’s amended petition, questioning its sufficiency to state a caus'e of action because of the alleged infirmities of the contract pleaded therein, and because of the character of the remedy sought. The specific claims of the.defendant are: (1) That the contract is void and unenforceable because of uncertainty, (2) that the contract lacks mutuality and (3) that plaintiff has an adequate remedy at law and is not entitled…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wells v. . AlexandreNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Crane v. C. Crane & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901
  3. Stensgaard v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  4. Lima Locomotive & Machine Co. v. National Steel Castings Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
  5. Turner & Happersett v. Hall & ConnorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Bach v. Friden Calculating MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
  2. Maids International, Inc. v. Ward (In Re Ward)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
  3. Tradesmen International, Incor v. John BlackCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  4. Mid-America Tire, Inc. v. PTZ Trading Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Phelps v. Shawprint, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API