Santa Rosa National Bank v. Barnett
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County and from an order denying a new trial. S. K. Dougherty, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Action to enforce the personal liability of defendants as stockholders in Central Street Railway Company, a corporation. Defendants pleaded the statute of limitations, and upon that plea had judgment except as to the sum of *409$392.49, for which plaintiff had judgment against defendants for the proportionate share of each. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment and from an order denying motion for new trial.
The court found that defendants were stockholders of the railway company; that from and after May 28, 1891, and until December 4, 1892, plaintiff loaned and advanced the company, from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hunt v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Pauly v. PaulyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Hyman v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Norton v. LarcoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Rocca v. KleinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gardiner v. RoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Carter v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Royal Trust Co. v. MacBeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Coombes v. GetzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Jones v. Goldtree Bros. Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.