Hyman v. Coleman
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and. county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
This is an action to recover from the defendants, as stockholders of a corporation, their several proportions of an indebtedness due plaintiff from the corporation.
The complaint contains two counts. In the first it is alleged that plaintiff advanced and loaned to the corporation, on the seventh day of October, 1879, the sum of two thousand dollars, for which the corporation then and there executed to plaintiff its promissory note, payable in one year after date, with interest, and that “ said promissory note was renewed by said corporation each year by the surrender of all…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jagger Iron Co. v. . WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Mitchell v. BeckmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Young v. RosenbaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Moore v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Mokelumne Hill Canal & Mining Co. v. WoodburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Emery v. Pacific Employers InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Redington v. CornwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Ellsworth v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Chambers v. FarnhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Bank of San Luis Obispo v. Pacific Coast Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.