Legal Opinion

Royal Trust Co. v. MacBean

California Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1914No. L.A. No. 3364PublishedCited by 30 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendants upon the,sustaining of their demurrer to the second amended complaint.

The action was brought to enforce the liability of the defendants, under the laws of the Dominion of Canada, as stockholders of an insolvent bank which had been incorporated under the laws of said dominion. The complaint sets forth very fully the statutory provisions governing the incorporation of banks, the liability of stockholders, and the procedure in eases of insolvency or bankruptcy.

It appears that by the “Bank Act” of Canada, enacted in 1890, it is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hunt v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Platt v. WilmotSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Gardiner v. RoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Moore v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Kennedy v. California Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Biewend v. BiewendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. McCann v. Foster Wheeler LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Abram v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1942
  4. Coombes v. GetzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Hoover v. GalbraithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API