Legal Opinion
In Re Smith
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided December 19, 1929No. Patent Appeal 2169PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRAHAM, Presiding Judge.
The appellant filed six claims for a patent on improvements in typewriting machines. All these claims were rejected by the Examiner, the Examiners in Chief, and the Commissioner of Patents, and the applicant has appealed to this court. The claimed improvements to typewriting machines disclosed by the applicant’s claims, specifications, and drawings, consist in using, in connection with a continuous billing or fan-fold machine, carbon sheets of a length greater than that for which the machine is designed, so as to provide supply or reserve portions which may be used…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Morgan Envelope Co. v. Albany Perforated Wrapping Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Roberts v. RyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Ansonia Brass & Copper Co. v. Electrical Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Heyer v. Duplicator Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- H. K. Regar & Sons, Inc. v. Scott & Williams, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Braren v. HornerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Indiana General Corp. v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1966
- In Re DownsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- Swan v. ThompsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936