Legal Opinion
Braren v. Horner
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 25, 1931No. Patent Appeal 2600PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRAHAM, Presiding Judge.
The appellant, Lorenz Konrad Braren, filed his application in the Patent Office on December 4, 1923, for improvements in belt gearings. On June 23, 1924, the appellee, George Horner, filed his application for a patent on improvements in and relating to engraving machines. The Horner application went to patent on November 17, 1925, as No. 1,562,237. On June .12, 1926, an interference was declared by the Patent Office between Homer’s patent and the aforesaid application of Braren, the counts of the interference being eight in number, and having been taken from the Horner…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Frederick R. Stearns & Co. v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
- Commonwealth v. FontainMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
- Beidler v. CapsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
- Ford Motor Co. v. Parks & Bohne, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- W. W. Sly Mfg. Co. v. Russell & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Application of BennerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
- Bruce's Juices, Inc. v. American Can Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1949
- Hall v. ShimadzuCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
- Grosjean v. Panther-Panco Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
- Fageol v. MidboeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.