Indiana General Corp. v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, District Judge.
This is a patent case wherein the plaintiff seeks an injunction and damages for infringement. The defendant’s answer denies infringement and alleges invalidity on the customary array of grounds, only one of which is involved at this time.
The matter for immediate consideration and decision is the defendant’s motion for summary judgment [F.R.Civ.P. 56(b), (c), (e)].
Before discussing the specific questions raised in the motion, it is necessary to make some general observations concerning the use of summary judgment and to advert to the contention of the plaintiff that…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Abbott v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Application of Ernst Johan Jens HenriksenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Continental Can CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1967
- Indiana General Corp. v. Krystinel Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Holmes v. Thew Shovel Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1969
- Potter Instrument Co., Inc. v. ODEC Computer Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.