Legal Opinion

H. K. Regar & Sons, Inc. v. Scott & Williams, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 14, 1933No. 214PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

The patent in suit is for a method of producing a scalloped edge at the top of knitted “seamless” stockings. Tho application included such edges both when folded over and unfolded, but the patentee was unsuccessful in securing claims for the second feature, and we are therefore concerned only with the first. “Seamless” stockings are woven all around so as to make continuous tubes; more expensive, and therefore more elegant, stockings are woven fiat, and sewn together at the back, showing a seam; these are called “full-fashioned.” Wo have already had occasion to discuss…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. Roberts v. RyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1875

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Garlock, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  2. Dewey & Almy Chemical Co. v. Mimex Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  3. Maurice A. Garbell, Inc. v. Boeing CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1973
  4. Hutzler Bros. v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
  5. In Re ThuauCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API