Legal Opinion

In Re Downs

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 19, 1930No. Patent Appeal 2549PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LENROOT, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the- United States Patent Office affirming that of the Examiner finally rejecting all the claims of appellants’ application.

Claims 2 and 10 are illustrative of the claims in issue and road as follows:

“2. The process which comprises coating one side of a sheet of metal with a catalyst in good heat-conducting relation therewith, maintaining a liquid in contact with the other side of said sheet of metal and bringing reactive material into contact with said catalyst.”
“10. In an apparatus of the class…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Minerals Separation North American Corp. v. Magma Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. United States Mitis Co. v. Midvale Steel Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1904
  4. In Re SmithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Allied Wheel Products, Inc. v. RudeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  2. Braren v. HornerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  3. Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. LaddDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1964
  4. Indiana General Corp. v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1966
  5. Swan v. ThompsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API