Legal Opinion

Peterson v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided July 23, 1999No. A-6889PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

Alaska Criminal Rule 11(c)(4) declares that, when a defendant offers to plead guilty or no contest to a sex offense listed in AS 12.63.100, a judge must not accept the plea until the judge has informed the defendant, personally and in writing, of the requirements of Alaska’s sex offender registration act, AS 12.63.010-100. This case involves a defendant who pleaded no contest to a sex offense and was convicted and sentenced based on that plea. In violation of Criminal Rule 11(c)(4), the judge who accepted the defendant’s plea did not warn the defendant about sex…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Petersen v. Mutual Life Insuarance Co. of New YorkAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988
  3. Tafoya v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. GlassAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Lewis v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Kaiser v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. People v. MontaineColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Ramsey v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. State v. WhalenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Tazruk v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2003

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API