Legal Opinion

People v. Montaine

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided December 23, 1999No. 98CA1948PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge RULAND.

Defendant, James E. Montaine, appeals from the trial court order denying his motions for post-conviction relief pursuant to Crim. P. 85(a) and Crim. P. 85(c). We affirm.

Pursuant to a plea agreement, defendant pled no contest to two counts of second degree sexual assault in 1994. In exchange for his pleas, the prosecution agreed to dismiss the remaining charges against defendant. There were no sentencing concessions.

Shortly thereafter, defendant was sentenced to 15 years probation. However, in 1996, defendant violated the terms of his probation. As a result, defendant's…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. State v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Craig v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  4. People v. PozoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  5. In Re BirchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ward v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  2. People v. FonvilleMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. William J. Hunsaker, Jr. v. The People of the State of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
  4. People v. McMurreyColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Ramsey v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API