Legal Opinion

Tazruk v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided April 11, 2003No. A-8284PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

Hugh R. Tazruk appeals the superior court's dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief. Based on the record, the superior court was completely justified in dismissing Tazruk's petition because Tazruk failed to present a prima facie case that he was entitled to relief.

The only real issue in this case is the possibility that Tazruk received ineffective assistance of counsel in the investigation and preparation of his petition for post-conviction relief. Normally, an appellate court will not consider claims of ineffective assistance for the first time on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988
  3. People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Peterson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1999
  5. Gonzales v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In re GouldSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  2. David v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2016
  3. Wassilie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2014
  4. Gareth R. Demoski v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2019
  5. Nelson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API