Legal Opinion

Kaiser v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 18, 2002No. C5-00-807PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STRINGER, Justice.

Appellant pleaded guilty to a gross misdemeanor offense without being advised that as a consequence of the plea he was statutorily required to register as a preda*902tory offender. Appellant moved to withdraw his guilty plea and the court denied the motion, concluding that the plea was “accurate, voluntary and intelligent.” Appellant then petitioned the court for post-conviction relief arguing inter aha that he would not have pleaded guilty if he had been advised of his duty to register as a predatory offender. The district court denied the petition holding that appellant…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  3. State v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Joseph F. Cuthrell v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
  5. State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Ward v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State of Iowa v. Kevin Duane Fisher IISupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  3. In Re Richard A.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  4. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  5. Junious Taylor, Jr. v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API