Legal Opinion

State v. Conard

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 6, 1981No. 8127SC313PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

At trial, the State presented evidence tending to show that several items including some RCA portable television sets had been stolen from a grocery store, and that the theft had been perpetrated by the defendant and one Gary Godfrey. The State had also presented evidence tending to show that one of the stolen television sets was sold by the defendant to one Larry Willis.

Defendant assigns as error the trial court’s denial of a motion to strike certain testimony offered by the State. The objected-to testimony was given by Detective R. F. Moore and stated that on two separate…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. State v. SatterfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. DrakefordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. HyattCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  5. State v. JoynerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. JeffriesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. State v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. State v. IngramCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API