Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 6, 1990No. 8918SC90PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendant first assigns error to the denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained from the search of his person. We find no merit to this assignment of error. N.C.G.S. § 15A-976(b) states, “If the State gives notice not later than 20 working days before trial of its intention to use evidence. . . , the defendant may move to suppress the evidence only if its motion is made not later than 10 working days following receipt of the notice from the State.” On 31 May 1988, the State provided the defendant with notice of its intent to introduce evidence obtained by search without…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. McNeilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. ChavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. VincentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. HollowaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. ConardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SakobieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. State v. WilkersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API