Legal Opinion

State v. Ingram

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1983No. 8318SC247PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

Guilt Phase

Defendant contends the court committed prejudicial error by failing to hold a voir dire upon his general objection to the following testimony by the arresting officer, which he argues showed “a virtual confession to the charge of possession of a firearm by a felon”:

Q. . . . tell the members of the jury what you asked him about this pistol, and what, if anything, his response was.

Mr. McClellan: Objection, Your Honor.

Mr. Ingram: Object.

THE Court: Overruled.

Q. ... Go ahead.

A. I asked Mr. Ingram whose pistol this was; he replied, “It’s mine.”

I then asked him, where did…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. FaustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. State v. BlackwelderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. SatterfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. MorstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API