State v. Ingram
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WHICHARD, Judge.
Guilt Phase
Defendant contends the court committed prejudicial error by failing to hold a voir dire upon his general objection to the following testimony by the arresting officer, which he argues showed “a virtual confession to the charge of possession of a firearm by a felon”:
Q. . . . tell the members of the jury what you asked him about this pistol, and what, if anything, his response was.
Mr. McClellan: Objection, Your Honor.
Mr. Ingram: Object.
THE Court: Overruled.
Q. ... Go ahead.
A. I asked Mr. Ingram whose pistol this was; he replied, “It’s mine.”
I then asked him, where did…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. FaustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. BlackwelderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. SatterfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. MorstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012