State v. Arnold
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Justice.
Defendant first contends that the trial judge committed reversible error by expressing an opinion prejudicial to defendant in the presence of the jury.
During the cross-examination of Sally Campbell, defendant’s counsel introduced several photographs into evidence. At that time the following exchange occurred:
“Court: All right, gentlemen. Mr. Levine, have you got any more Exhibits you intend to introduce during this trial, any statements, documents, anything of that nature?
Mr. Levine: Yes, sir. There may be one or two more things.
Court: All right. Mr. Pierce, do you have any…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. FaustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. GolphinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. StagerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. Van McDougallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.