Legal Opinion

State v. Hyatt

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 6, 1977No. 7630SC762PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant brings forward nine assignments of error which have been grouped into eight arguments. His first assignment is that the trial court erred in failing to grant his motion to sever the three cases for trial. Defendant contends that if the cases hád been tried separately, he would have had the election of presenting evidence in one case without being forced to present evidence in the others. Severance of criminal cases is governed by G.S. 15A-927.

In State v. Davis, 289 N.C. 500, 507, 508, 223 S.E. 2d 296, the Supreme Court stated:

“The general rule in this jurisdiction is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pointer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. JarretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ConardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. CreechCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. DowlessCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. PoucherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API