Legal Opinion
Benedict v. Pfunder
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 22, 1931No. 28,385PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
The trial of this action having resulted in the direction of a verdict for defendant, plaintiff appeals from the order denying his motion for new trial.
Plaintiff declared on two causes of action: First, on a written contract of January 17, 1928, whereby defendant, inventor and owner of a valuable secret remedy “known as Pfunder’s Stomach Tablets,” promised plaintiff a commission of $100,000 for procuring “a person, persons, or corporation that is willing and able to purchase” the remedy and all rights therein for $1,000,000. The purchase price was to be .payable $350,000 cash and the balance…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Town of Balkan v. Village of BuhlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Elliott v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Fargo Foundry Co. v. Village of CallawaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Bentley v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Wentworth v. CrawfordTexas Supreme Court · 1853
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Cederstrand v. Lutheran BrotherhoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Roberge v. Cambridge Cooperative Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Cut Price Super Markets v. Kingpin Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Bergstedt, Wahlberg, Berquist Associates, Inc. v. RothchildSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Roberge v. Cambridge Cooperative Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.