Legal Opinion

Cut Price Super Markets v. Kingpin Foods, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 7, 1959No. 37,408PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nelson, Justice.

This is an action commenced by Cut Price Super Markets, a partnership, as plaintiff, against Kingpin Foods, Inc., a corporation formerly known as Hillcrest Super Food Market, Inc., as defendant, for the recovery of damages for breach of contract.

The parties to the action entered into a written franchise agreement on December 9, 1949. The agreement was for a period of 10 years and provided for operations to commence not later than July 1, 1950. Plaintiff had operated a number of supermarkets throughout the city of St. Paul prior to December 9, 1949, under the trade name “Cut…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Dobie v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1935
  2. Duluth Chamber of Commerce v. KnowltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. Leslie v. Minneapolis Teachers Retirement Fund Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. Benedict v. PfunderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Cederstrand v. Lutheran BrotherhoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  2. Carlock v. Pillsbury Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
  3. Youngstown Mines Corp. v. ProutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  4. Martin Investors, Inc. v. Vander BieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Olson v. RugloskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API