Legal Opinion
Town of Balkan v. Village of Buhl
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 21, 1924No. 23,805PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to an answer and counterclaim which brings here for review the one question as to the right between the parties, to the taxes for 1920, assessed for local purposes against the section and a half of land hereinafter referred to.
Plaintiff is an organized town and defendant a village on the Missabe range in St. Louis county. In 1920 the village attempted to annex a considerable portion of the cut-over wilderness which adjoins it. The annexation proceedings were complete and supposedly became effective on or about September 20, 1920. They were…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Cary v. CurtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Chapman v. County of DouglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Louisiana v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- City of Norfolk v. Norfolk CountySupreme Court of Virginia · 1917
- Strough v. Board of Supervisors of Jefferson CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Olson v. Synergistic Technologies Business Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- In Re the Accounting of ZalewskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Lundstrom Construction Co. v. DygertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Roske v. IlykanyicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Roberge v. Cambridge Cooperative Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.