Legal Opinion

Two Certain Ford Coupe Automobiles v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 30, 1931No. 6008PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Circuit Judge.

By two separate libels, the appellee, the United States, sought the forfeiture of two Ford automobiles under section 3450 of the Revised Statutes (26 USCA § 1181). The libels were identical except as to the statement of the motor number of the automobile sought to be forfeited. Each alleged: (1) That on the 8th day of August, 1929, the described automobile was seized on land in the city of Savannah, Ga., by officers of the government, and is now in custody of the named prohibition administrator at Savannah, Ga.; (2) that at divers times throughout the period from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Coffey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Dodge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Lilienthal's Tobacco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. One 1956 Ford Tudor Sedan (Victoria) Motor No. M6nv-112513 (Steve Kaluk, Jr., Claimant)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  2. Harman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
  3. Joseph Interbartolo v. United States of America, LibellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1962
  4. Sanders v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  5. Fell v. ArmourDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API