Legal Opinion

Fell v. Armour

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided November 27, 1972No. Civ. A. 6367PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1323MORTON, District Judge.

Plaintiff brings tins suit as a class action challenging the constitutionality of various provisions of the Tennessee Drug Control Act of 1971, T.C.A. §§ 52-1408 — 52-1448, and by incorporation T. C.A. §§ 52-1404 — 52-1407. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief authorized by 42 U. S.C. § 1983 and declaratory relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202 and Rule 57 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Jurisdiction is conferred on this Court by 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3) and (4) which provide for original jurisdiction in United States district courts of suits authorized by 42…

2Cases cited88 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LandySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Kirkland v. State Ex Rel. BaxleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  3. Southeastern Michigan Transportation Authority v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. One (1) 1971 Ford Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Holladay v. RobertsDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API