Legal Opinion
Harman v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided September 25, 1952No. 6415_1PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER Chief Judge. . . . This is an appeal m a proceeding mstiunder 26 usc §§ 2831 m6 and P ,, , , , ’ ... 3321, for the forfeiture of an automobile „ , , , , , truck which it was alleged had been used , . , ° to convey materials and necessary equipment to an illicit distillery by one Roy Harman. Lucille Harman filed an intervening petition claiming that she was the owner of the truck and that she had no knowledge that it was being used in violation of the internal revenue laws. A jury trial was had, and in response to issues submitted to them the jury found that the truck was used by Roy…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wood v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Di Carlo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Gelston v. HoytSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- United States v. BorelliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Theodore D. MorlangCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
- Finnegan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
- United States v. BorelliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Paul N. Hankish, and James L. MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.