General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.
These cases involve a consideration of the circumstances under which an automobile may be forfeited -under Rev St. § 3450 (26 USCA § 1181). In each case, the automobile was discovered by border patrol immigration inspectors, while moving in the vicinity of the Detroit river, the one in the city of Detroit, and the other near Wyandotte. Upon the approach of the officers, the driver, in each instance, fled, leaving the automobile unattended. Both automobiles were found to contain large' quantities of assorted Canadian liquor which bore no United States revenue…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Port Gardner Investment Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Commercial Credit Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- United States v. One Cadillac Automobile Bearing Motor No. 61-v-238District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Myres v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
- Two Certain Ford Coupe Automobiles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
- United States v. FloridaDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1958
- United States v. One Ford V-8 Sedan, 1934 ModelDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1935
- United States v. Southern Agency Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.