Legal Opinion

Sanders v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 14, 1953No. 13972PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from an order forfeiting to the United States certain property used in violation of the Internal Revenue Laws, Sections 3116, 3321, Title 26 U.S.C. It is alleged that the court erred in overruling a motion to suppress evidence, and in refusing to return the automobile to the claimant because it was illegally seized without a warrant. The basic question presented is whether an officer of the United States, having seen property used in violation of the Internal Revenue Laws, may return to the premises of the alleged owner on a later date and, without a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Wood v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  3. United States v. StowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Dodge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Robert O. O'Reilly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  2. Farley v. $168,400.97Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  3. United States v. One 1956 Ford Tudor Sedan (Victoria) Motor No. M6nv-112513 (Steve Kaluk, Jr., Claimant)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  4. Fuqua v. ArmourTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Joseph Interbartolo v. United States of America, LibellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1962

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API