Legal Opinion

Joseph Interbartolo v. United States of America, Libellant

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 22, 1962No. 5919_1PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the United States in a libel for forfeiture of an automobile alleged to have been used in contravention of the provisions of the internal revenue wagering tax laws. 1 Specifically, this case raises the question of whether an automobile used to transport wagering slips and adding machine tapes in the course of activity by a “pick-up man” in the numbers game is subject to forfeiture under the federal wagering tax laws.

In the argot of number pool wagering, it appears that the term “pick-up man” is applied to the individual who…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ingram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. United States v. CalamaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Dodge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. The SybilSupreme Court of the United States · 1819

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. United States v. Gold Mountain Coffee, Ltd.United States Court of International Trade · 1984
  2. United States v. One 1975 Pontiac Lemans, Vehicle I.D. No. 2f37m56101227, Appeal of Irma ZulloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  3. Robert O. O'Reilly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  4. Samuel Berkowitz v. United States of America, LibellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965
  5. Director of Fin., Pr. Geo's Co. v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API