Legal Opinion
Matter of Discipline of Tieso
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 14, 1986No. C4-85-2210PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
The Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board (LPRB) petitioned this court for disciplinary action against respondent Robert J. Tieso, charging him with one count of unprofessional conduct. We assigned the petition to a referee for a full hearing pursuant to Rule 14 of the Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR). The referee submitted his findings of fact, conclusions of law and a recommendation to this court. Pursuant to RLPR 14(d), respondent ordered a transcript of the proceedings and challenges several of the referee’s findings, which we shall summarize…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re the Discipline of SerstockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Matter of Discipline of AgnewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Matter of Discipline of KraemerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Matter of Discipline of SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re Disciplinary Action Against UlanowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Mark Alan GREENMAN, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 228990Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- In re Disciplinary Action Against MurrinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against PinottiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.