Legal Opinion

Matter of Discipline of Smith

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 7, 1986No. CO-85-1152PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board filed with this court a petition alleging professional misconduct committed on the part of respondent, Robert Lowell Smith. We assigned the petition to a referee for hearing pursuant to the Minnesota Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility. Subsequently, the referee submitted his findings and conclusions to this court. Both the Director of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board and respondent Smith agreed to accept the referee’s findings and conclusions as conclusive. See In re Furuseth, 274 N.W.2d 122 (Minn.1978).

The Director’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re the Discipline of CartwrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Matter of Disciplinary Act. Against WeyhrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Matter of Disciplinary Action Against FrankeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. In Re DalySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  5. Matter of Discipline of AgnewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Matter of Discipline of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against LochowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against MadsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against WalkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against LaddSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API