Legal Opinion
In re Disciplinary Action Against Murrin
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 19, 2012No. A11-0108PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
In December 2010, the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition for disciplinary action against Respondent John 0. Murrin, III, alleging that Murrin had violated Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 3.2 and 8.4(d). The Director’s allegations arose from Murrin’s conduct while attempting to recoup money Murrin lost in a Ponzi scheme.1 More *198specifically, the alleged misconduct involved legal actions Murrin commenced in three separate courts: (1) Hennepin County District Court, (2) United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, and (3) United States…
3Cases cited23 opinions
- Ellis v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil RightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against OberhauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- In re Disciplinary Action Against UlanowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against AlbrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by21 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MixterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- In re Disciplinary Action Against TaplinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- In re Disciplinary Action Against MichaelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- In re Disciplinary Action Against SeaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- In RE Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Jesse David MATSON, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0389131Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.