Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Pearson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 3, 1984No. C6-82-671PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

The Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board (LPRB) filed a petition for disciplinary action against respondent, Kenneth R. Pearson, alleging ten counts of professional misconduct. The referee appointed by this court found facts supporting only two counts of professional misconduct in violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility 1 and recommended that Pearson be suspended for 2 years but that the suspension be stayed subject to conditions. The counts of misconduct involved a fee dispute with one client and a business transaction with another client.

Pearson does not contest the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Discipline of CartwrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Van Asperen v. Darling Olds, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. In Re DalySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  4. Matter of Discipline of AgnewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against BoydSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Matter of Discipline of GubbinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. In Re the Discipline of HartkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against SwensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against OlsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API