Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company v. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 30, 1960No. 13203PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STALEY, Circuit Judge.

The primary question raised on this appeal is whether under the insurance contracts issued to Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company (“Pittsburgh”) by Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York (“Fidelity”) it was incumbent upon Fidelity to appear and defend on Pittsburgh’s behalf a law suit instituted by Columbia Air-O-Blind Company in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of South Carolina and indemnify Pittsburgh for the amount paid by it in settlement.

Fidelity, a New York corporation engaged in the insurance business in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lee v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  2. Cadwallader v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Hauenstein v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. Geddes & Smith, Inc. v. Saint Paul Mercuy Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Pittway Corp. v. American Motorists InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. Todd Shipyards Corp. v. Turbine Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. Kendall Plumbing, Inc. v. St. Paul Mercury InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  5. Geddes & Smith, Inc. v. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1965

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API