Legal Opinion
Hensley v. Danek Medical, Inc.
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Decided May 5, 1998No. Civ. 1:96CV300PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
THORNBURG, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment against Plaintiffs Wilburn R. and Margaret King who oppose the motion. For the reasons stated below, the Court grants the Defendants’ motion and dismisses the action as to the Plaintiffs King.
I. STANDARD OF REVIEW
Summary judgment is appropriate if there is no genuine issue of material fact and judgment for the moving party is warranted as a matter of law. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). A genuine issue exists if a reasonable jury considering the evidence could return a verdict for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Shaw v. StroudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McClamrock v. Eli Lilly and Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Samuel v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000
- Hartwell v. Danek Medical, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1999
- Driggers v. Sofamor, S.N.C.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1999
- Cisson v. C.R. Bard, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.