Legal Opinion
McClamrock v. Eli Lilly and Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 4, 2003No. CIV.A. 02-2383(RBW)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WALTON, District Judge.
Currently before the Court is defendant Eli Lilly and Company’s (“Lilly”) motion to transfer, which asserts that plaintiffs claims should be transferred to the Middle District of North Carolina pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (2000). For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant the defendant’s motion and transfer this action to the Middle District of North Carolina.
I. Background
This product liability action, which was brought in this Court pursuant to the Court’s diversity of citizenship jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (2000), was filed by…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Trout Unlimited v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Ideal Electronic Security Co. v. International Fidelity InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Greater Yellowstone Coalition v. BosworthDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Reiffin v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Armco Steel Co., LP v. CSX Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Sierra Club v. FlowersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- National Wildlife Federation v. HarveyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Spaeth v. Michigan State University College of LawDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Chauhan v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Schmidt v. American Institute of PhysicsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.