Legal Opinion
Samuel v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 1, 2000No. CIV. A. WMN-96-2155PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum and Order
GRIMM, United States Magistrate Judge.
The Plaintiffs filed suit against Ford, among others, on July 12, 1996, alleging a variety of product defect claims. They assert that the 1993 Ford Aerostar van is defective, and unreasonably dangerous, because it has a propensity to roll over. In this case, the Aerostar in which the Plaintiffs were riding rolled over after it was struck by Defendant Hamilton’s Ford Econoline van, resulting in the death of Mr. Michael Samuel’s wife, Alicia, and their infant child, as well as serious injuries to the Bergers, who also were occupants.
After…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Pierce v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. BalbosCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Casey v. Geek Squad® Subsidiary Best Buy Stores, L.P.District Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- United States v. WillockDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
- Young v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- Doali-Miller v. Supervalu, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Adams v. NVR Homes, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.