Legal Opinion
Allstate Insurance v. Miller
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 19, 1990No. C-89-3496 SCPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CONTI, District Judge.
This action is brought by plaintiff, Allstate Insurance Company (“Allstate”), for a declaratory judgment that defendant Joy Miller’s homeowners insurance policy does not require Allstate to defend or indemnify her in a previously filed lawsuit. The underlying state court litigation concerns misrepresentations allegedly made in the formation of a real estate contract in which Joy Miller sold her condominium residence to Mildred Merlino. Allstate now seeks summary judgment on its claim for declaratory relief.
BACKGROUND
The…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Harry Jung, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Fmc Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- CNA Casualty of California v. Seaboard Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Chatton v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Devin v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Qualman v. BruckmoserCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- Unigard Security Insurance v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- American States Insurance v. Canyon CreekDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.