Legal Opinion

Qualman v. Bruckmoser

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided May 15, 1991No. 90-2431PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScott, J.

The trial court granted summary judgment dismissing the claims of the plaintiffs, Richard K. and Diana M. Qualman, and the cross-claim of the defendants, Ludwig and Annie M. Bruckmoser. The trial court held that there was no coverage in the homeowner’s policy issued by American Family Insurance Company to the Bruckmosers for the claims alleged by the Qualmans against the Bruckmosers, and that American Family therefore had no duty to defend the Bruck-mosers. The Bruckmosers appeal from the judgment. Because we agree with the trial court's conclusion that there is no coverage in the policy, we…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Grieb v. Citizens Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Sola Basic Industries, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Katze v. Randolph & Scott Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Professional Office Buildings, Inc. v. Royal Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
  5. Wisconsin Builders, Inc. v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State Farm Lloyds v. KesslerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Grube v. DaunCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  3. Wisconsin Label Corp. v. Northbrook Property & Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Smith v. KatzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Everson v. LorenzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API