Legal Opinion
Harry Jung, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Fmc Corporation, a Delaware Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 12, 1985No. C.A. 83-2083PublishedCited by 197 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FAIRCHILD, Senior Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-appellant Harry Jung, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, brought this class action against defendant-appellee FMC Corporation (FMC) to enforce rights to severance pay under an FMC policy which constitutes an employee welfare benefit plan under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. This action is authorized by 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B) and jurisdiction is conferred by 29 U.S.C. § 1132(e).
The district court granted summary judgment in favor of appellee FMC. We affirm.
FACTS
Plaintiffs in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Amax Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Blau v. Del Monte Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Fentron Industries, Inc. v. The National Shopmen Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Lillian Yanks Rehmar v. Bernard L. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Taylor v. Sentry Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by197 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Freeman v. ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Fred Brown v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- De Nobel v. Vitro Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Richard Atwood v. Newmont Gold Co., Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
192 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.