Legal Opinion
Snyder v. FARNAM COMPANIES, INC.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 26, 2011No. Civ. 10-1391PublishedCited by 132 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIAM J. MARTINI, District Judge:
This matter comes before the Court on Defendants Farnam Companies, Inc. (“Farnam”), and Wellmark International’s (“Wellmark”) motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). There was no oral argument. Fed.R.Civ.P. 78. For the reasons stated below, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint (“Complaint”) brings a putative class action on behalf of themselves and other purchasers and users of “spot on” flea and tick treatments for dogs and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Dean Hedges v. United States of America Environmental Moorings InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by132 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Golden Gate Nat'l Senior Care LLCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Argabright v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
- Dzielak v. Whirlpool Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- Mendez v. ShahDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- Montich v. Miele USA, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2012
127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.