Runner v. Bard
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DALZELL, District Judge.
The defendants seek dismissal of Joseph Runner’s nine-count lawsuit arising from injuries he allegedly sustained following the implantation during surgery of a Bard Composix L/P Mesh (hereinafter, the “Product” or “mesh product”). For the reasons set forth below, we will grant the defendants’ motion in part and deny it in part.
We have jurisdiction to consider the defendants’ motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332, as the plaintiff is a Pennsylvania resident, defendant C.R. Bard, Inc. (“Bard”) is a corporation, with its principal place of business in New Jersey,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Dean Hedges v. United States of America Environmental Moorings InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- McLaughlin v. Bayer Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Wilson v. Synthes USA Products, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Talarico v. Skyjack, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- BROWN v. C.R. BARD, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- Bostic v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.