Legal Opinion
Forst v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided March 11, 2009No. 1:07-mj-00612PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
J.P. STADTMUELLER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Gary and Bonita Forst (“the Forsts”) filed a products liability and personal injury action against Defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline (“GSK”) arising from Gary Forst’s attempted suicide after using the prescription antidepressant Paxil CR®, manufactured by the defendant. The Forsts allege claims for negligence, negligent pharmaco-vigilance, strict liability, express warranty, implied warranty, fraud, negligent infliction of emotional distress, and loss of consortium. GSK now brings this motion for summary judgment…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- In re Zimmer, Nexgen Knee Implant Prods. Liab. Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Smith v. PFIZER INC.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2010
- Forst v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2009
- Joas v. Zimmer, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- American International Group, Inc. v. Ace Ina Holdings, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.