Legal Opinion

Sun Refining & Marketing Company, Cross-Appellant v. Joseph E. Brennan, Cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 11, 1991No. 88-3858, 88-3927PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JARVIS, District Judge.

In this declaratory judgment action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201, plaintiff, Sun Refining & Marketing Company (“Sun”), asked the district court to declare that its unfired pressure vessels are subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”), and that the State of Ohio, represented by defendant Brennan, does not have jurisdiction over those vessels. Based upon stipulated facts, the district court ruled that Ohio law and standards governing the design, construction, operation, repair, and alteration of plaintiffs…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. O'NEILL v. CoughlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. Carole R. Squire v. Jonathan E. CoughlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  3. Federal Express Corporation v. Tennessee Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  4. Mounkes v. ConklinDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1996
  5. Hennessey v. Winslow TownshipSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API