Legal Opinion
Carole R. Squire v. Jonathan E. Coughlan
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 28, 2006No. 05-4513PublishedCited by 127 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILMAN, Circuit Judge.
Carole R. Squire, an Ohio state-court judge, filed an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Jonathan E. Coughlan, Disciplinary Counsel for the Supreme Court of Ohio. She contends that her right to the due process of law was violated when Coughlan failed to provide her with the names of all persons contacted by the Ohio Disciplinary Counsel in the course of an investigation into allegations of her judicial misconduct. Judge Squire received a draft complaint notifying her of the allegations and giving her the opportunity to respond before the complaint was filed with a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Geoffrey N. Fieger v. Philip J. Thomas, Grievance Administrator, and Michigan Attorney Grievance CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Sanford J. Berger Robert M. Fertel v. Cuyahoga County Bar AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by127 opinions
- Powers v. Hamilton County Public Defender CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Henry Hill v. Rick SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- O'NEILL v. CoughlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- American Family Prepaid Legal Corp. v. Columbus Bar AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Whittiker v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.