Legal Opinion
Mounkes v. Conklin
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 12, 1996No. 95-4143-SACPublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CROW, District Judge.
The plaintiffs bring this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. They allege that the bail bond system authorized by the Kansas Supreme Court Administrative Order No. 96 (“Order 96”) and the Third Judicial District Court Rule 3.311 (“DCR 3.311”) deprives them of constitutional rights to procedural and substantive due process, equal protection under the law and freedom from excessive bail. The plaintiffs seek a federal court order declaring Order 96 and DCR 3.311 illegal and void under the federal and state constitutions and enjoining the defendant judges…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Fisher v. LynchDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2008
- Wendy's International, Inc. v. Nu-Cape Construction, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1996
- ICE Corp. v. Hamilton Sundstrand Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006
- Klein v. University of Kansas Medical CenterDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997
- Teichgraeber v. Memorial Union Corp. of Emporia State UniversityDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1996
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.