Legal Opinion

The Stone Ft. Natl. Bank v. Forbess

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1936No. 6554PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Critz

This case is before us on a certified question from the Court of Civil Appeals for the Seventh District at Amarillo. The appeal involves only the question of venue. The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals prior to certification is reported at 41 S. W. (2d) 695. The case was certified in response to mandamus issued by this Court. The opinion on application for mandamus was written by Judge Ryan, speaking for Section B of the Commission, and is reported at 122 Texas, 526, 62 S. W. (2d) 86. We refer to these two opinions for statements of the issues involved. However, in order that this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Phillio v. BlytheTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  2. Graves v. McCollum LewisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Guinn v. Texas Drug Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Pittman & Harrison Co. v. ShookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. Stone Fort Nat. Bank of Nacogdoches v. ForbessCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. Krchnak v. Fulton, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1988
  2. Employers Casualty Company v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Lubbock Manufacturing Co. v. SamesTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  4. United States Pipe & Foundry Co. v. City of WacoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Frost National Bank v. Nicholas & BarreraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API