Legal Opinion

United States Pipe & Foundry Co. v. City of Waco

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 19, 1936No. 1732PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALEXANDER, Justice.

The City of Waco contracted for and had constructed a pipe line for the conveyance of water for municipal purposes from Lake Waco to the city’s filteration plant. The line proved defective and as a consequence the city brought this suit against O. N. Floyd and J. L. Lochridge, the engineers who drew the plans and specifications, W. E. Callahan Construction Company, the contractor, and United States Pipe & Foundry Company, who manufactured and furnished the pipe used in constructing the line, to recover the damages resulting therefrom. Plaintiff’s pleadings, so far as is…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. Burnett and WifeTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Atkinson v. Jackson Bros.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  3. The Stone Ft. Natl. Bank v. ForbessTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Spence v. . HamNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. Floyd v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1888

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. United States Pipe & Foundry Co. v. City of WacoTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. United States Pipe & Foundry Co. v. City of WacoTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Admiral Motor Hotel of Texas, Inc. v. Community Inns of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  4. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc. v. ShondellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
  5. Gleason v. Southwestern Sugar & Molasses Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1948

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API